HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023306.jpg
3.2 MB
Extraction Summary
10
People
6
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
6
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email draft / correspondence
File Size:
3.2 MB
Summary
This document appears to be a draft email or letter from Jeffrey Epstein (implied) to a wealthy client (likely Les Wexner), expressing grievance over a $20 million payment which he deems insufficient. The sender details extensive financial services provided, including recovering millions in dormant funds, reorganizing contracts (Phaidon, Gagosian), and managing tax liabilities, while criticizing other advisors like Brad Karp and Alan. The text includes a list of aggressive questions the client should ask their current team regarding the mismanagement of assets like Regan Arts and BRH.
People (10)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Sender (I) | Advisor / Consultant |
Likely Jeffrey Epstein. Claims to have managed finances, found lost money, and reorganized assets. Complaining about ...
|
| Recipient (You) | Client / Friend |
Likely Les Wexner (based on entities mentioned). Wealthy individual receiving financial services.
|
| Brad Karp | Lawyer / Negotiator |
Involved in fee negotiations; Sender claims Brad did not know of prior agreements.
|
| Alan | Associate |
Accused by sender of never proposing a unique idea in three years.
|
| Eileen | Staff / Associate |
Sender claims to have found '4 million dollars in eileens drawer'.
|
| John Murphy | Employee |
Mentioned in relation to Phaidon cash flows; sender states he 'is not an accountant'.
|
| Ada | Employee / Associate |
Stopped by sender from including things not in the client's interest.
|
| Wechsler | Advisor / Team Member |
Sender suggests asking him what 'BRH' is.
|
| Haperin | Advisor / Team Member |
Sender suggests asking him to describe 'BRH' or how transactions work.
|
| Bronstein | Advisor |
Sender suggests asking him why the Phaidon transaction does not work.
|
Organizations (6)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Phaidon |
Publishing company. Sender mentions cash flows and a proposed transaction.
|
|
| Gagosian |
Art gallery. Sender claims to have 'redid your gagosian contract'.
|
|
| Regan Arts |
Publishing. Sender challenges the team to provide a balance sheet for it.
|
|
| Bank of Scotland |
Financial institution. Sender found 'fbar problems'.
|
|
| BRH |
Business entity. Described as 'the major asset of his two biggest clients'.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Source of the document (Footer).
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Document focuses on financial locations (accounts) rather than physical geography.
|
Relationships (3)
Sender (Epstein)
→
Financial Advisor / Friend
→
Recipient (Wexner)
Sender claims acts were done 'out of friendship' but discusses specific financial compensation and services.
Disagreement over payment amounts; Sender claims Brad was unaware of agreements.
Money found in her drawer belonging to Recipient's operations.
Key Quotes (6)
"I believe the decision re paying only 20 m has frankly left me felling quite uneasy."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023306.jpg
Quote #1
"i found 11 million dollars in dormant accounts. 4 million dollars in eileens drawer."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023306.jpg
Quote #2
"not one-,not -one time in three years has he ever proposed a unique idea."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023306.jpg
Quote #3
"redid your gagosian contract"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023306.jpg
Quote #4
"organized structure in case of divorce."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023306.jpg
Quote #5
"the transactions that i decvised were used , our agreement was ignored."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023306.jpg
Quote #6
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document