DOJ-OGR-00009389.jpg
455 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
455 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript of testimony given by an individual named Edelstein, filed on February 24, 2022. Edelstein is being questioned about his awareness that a juror, Ms. Conrad (Juror No. 1), was the same person as Catherine M. Conrad, a suspended New York attorney. He states that he initially found it 'inconceivable' they were the same person and was not focused on her middle initial, and denies being told by Theresa Trzaskoma about reports or documents that would have clarified the juror's identity.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edelstein | Witness |
The person being questioned throughout the transcript.
|
| Ms. Conrad | Juror (Juror No. 1) |
A juror who stated she had a BA in English literature and was a stay-at-home wife. She is the subject of the question...
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
Mentioned as having the middle initial 'M' and is believed to be the same person as Ms. Conrad and Catherine M. Conrad.
|
| Theresa Trzaskoma |
A person who allegedly saw a report and a Westlaw printout about Catherine M. Conrad and had a conversation with Edel...
|
|
| Catherine M. Conrad | Suspended New York attorney |
The full name of the individual believed to be the same person as Juror No. 1 / Ms. Conrad.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Westlaw | Company |
Mentioned as the source of a printout with biographical information for Catherine M. Conrad.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the document.
|
Timeline (2 events)
A past event where Ms. Conrad responded to questions, stating her highest level of education was a BA and that she was a stay-at-home wife.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the description of Catherine M. Conrad as a 'suspended New York attorney'.
|
Relationships (2)
The document describes a conversation between them regarding a juror, suggesting a professional or legal context for their interaction.
Edelstein is testifying about his knowledge and assumptions regarding Ms. Conrad in her capacity as Juror No. 1 during a legal proceeding.
Key Quotes (4)
"It just was inconceivable to me that she was the same person. I wasn't thinking about middle initials."Source
— Edelstein
(Explaining why he initially did not connect Juror No. 1 (Ms. Conrad) with the suspended attorney Catherine M. Conrad.)
DOJ-OGR-00009389.jpg
Quote #1
"in hindsight we now know that they're the same person and that they have the same middle initial, but at the time I had no idea that Juror No. 1's middle initial was M."Source
— Edelstein
(Acknowledging that he now knows the juror and the attorney are the same person, but he was unaware of the shared middle initial during the relevant time.)
DOJ-OGR-00009389.jpg
Quote #2
"Ms. Trzaskoma did not mention any report."Source
— Edelstein
(Answering a question about whether Theresa Trzaskoma told him about a report containing Catherine M. Conrad's middle initial.)
DOJ-OGR-00009389.jpg
Quote #3
"I did not ask for any documents, no."Source
— Edelstein
(Responding to a question about whether he asked Ms. Trzaskoma for documents supporting her belief about Juror No. 1.)
DOJ-OGR-00009389.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document