DOJ-OGR-00000206.tif

35.3 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document (likely a brief or court filing)
File Size: 35.3 KB
Summary

This document discusses the unequal bargaining power between the government and defendants in plea agreements, citing legal precedents and academic works. It highlights that ambiguities in such agreements should be construed against the government and emphasizes the significant power held by the United States Attorney in the legal process, making plea bargains akin to contracts of adhesion where the defendant has little choice but to accept the offer.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Charles Breyer Judge
accurately described the process of plea bargaining
Erik Luna Author
co-author of 'Prosecutors as Judges'
Marianne Wade Author
co-author of 'Prosecutors as Judges'
defendant Litigant
referred to generally in the context of plea agreements and bargaining power

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States Government
referred to as having 'advantage in bargaining power' and offering plea deals
United States Attorney
possesses 'enormous power' in the legal process
DOJ-OGR
Document identification mark (Department of Justice - Office of Government Relations, or similar)

Relationships (1)

Erik Luna co-authors Marianne Wade
co-authored 'Prosecutors as Judges'

Key Quotes (4)

""advantage in bargaining power""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000206.tif
Quote #1
"ambiguities like this one must be construed against the government."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000206.tif
Quote #2
"It is no answer to say that [the defendant] is striking a deal with the Government, and could reject this term if he wanted to, because that statement does not reflect the reality of the bargaining table."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000206.tif
Quote #3
""American prosecutors . . . choose whether to engage in plea negotiations and the terms of an acceptable agreement.""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000206.tif
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document