DOJ-OGR-00016485.jpg
589 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
589 KB
Summary
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, documents a discussion between the judge and Mr. Everdell while the jury is not present. The judge addresses several procedural matters, including a recent order denying the defense's request for witness anonymity and the late receipt of a letter with government objections. They also discuss the scheduling for a witness whose testimony involves prior inconsistent statements, with Mr. Everdell indicating such a witness would not appear until after lunch.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker who is presiding over the trial and discussing procedural issues.
|
| MR. EVERDELL |
Speaker addressing the court regarding witness scheduling and procedural matters.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
The trial resumed with the jury not present to discuss procedural issues.
Courtroom
Relationships (1)
Mr. Everdell addresses the Court as 'Your Honor' and they are engaged in a formal discussion about the proceedings of a trial, indicating a judge-counsel relationship.
Key Quotes (3)
"I did address the issue of defense witness anonymity by order last night, which will be docketed this morning when docketing puts it up, denying the defense request for anonymity for the reasons indicated."Source
— THE COURT
(Explaining a ruling made the previous night regarding a defense motion.)
DOJ-OGR-00016485.jpg
Quote #1
"I received the letter with the government objections close to 11 p.m. last night."Source
— THE COURT
(Informing the parties about a late submission from the government regarding the prior inconsistent statements issue.)
DOJ-OGR-00016485.jpg
Quote #2
"I don't think we have a witness until after lunch that is going to implicate the prior inconsistent statements."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Responding to the Court's question about the timing of witnesses related to a specific evidentiary issue.)
DOJ-OGR-00016485.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document