DOJ-OGR-00011637.jpg
632 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
632 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a discussion between a judge and an attorney, Ms. Moe. The conversation centers on the admissibility of 'Government Exhibit 52,' with the judge deciding not to preclude it before trial. They clarify the nature of anticipated testimony from a witness, Ms. Comey, who is expected to authenticate the exhibit by describing its similarity to a book she has seen, even though she is unaware of how the government obtained it.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Comey | Witness |
Mentioned as the witness whose anticipated testimony is being discussed. She is expected to authenticate an exhibit b...
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, likely an attorney, who is clarifying the details of a witness's testimony to the court.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, the judge presiding over the case, who is questioning Ms. Moe to understand the nature o...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Appears at the bottom of the transcript, indicating the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Relationships (1)
The dialogue between them follows the formal structure of a court proceeding, with Ms. Moe addressing the judge as 'your Honor' and responding to the judge's questions about legal and evidentiary matters.
Key Quotes (3)
"I'm not going to preclude, but I do think this needs to play out at trial. I need to hear the witness testimony and I'll allow voir dire, given factually what I understand to be the issues surrounding this item..."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge's ruling on the defense's motion in limine 7 regarding Government Exhibit 52.)
DOJ-OGR-00011637.jpg
Quote #1
"The anticipated testimony, Ms. Comey -- this is for you, Ms. Comey -- the anticipated testimony is that not this exact book but a similar-looking book, characteristically similar, binding, pages, font, etc., was seen by this witness, and she can attempt to authenticate by describing the similarities between what is Government Exhibit 52 and what she saw."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge summarizing their understanding of the expected testimony from witness Ms. Comey for clarification.)
DOJ-OGR-00011637.jpg
Quote #2
"Because this witness has not been informed about how that exhibit came into the government's possession, I just wanted to clarify one small thing, which is that this witness won't say that this isn't one of the -- you know, in particular, that because she recognizes it as one in a series, but doesn't know how it came to the government's possession, it's just identifying it in that way."Source
— MS. MOE
(An attorney clarifying the limits of the witness's knowledge regarding the provenance of Government Exhibit 52.)
DOJ-OGR-00011637.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document