DOJ-OGR-00019576.jpg

712 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
7
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 712 KB
Summary

This legal document, dated August 24, 2020, is page 3 of a filing to Judge Alison J. Nathan on behalf of Ms. Maxwell. It argues against the U.S. Government's position, refuting the claim that materials Ms. Maxwell seeks to file under seal are 'Confidential' or would compromise a 'secret' investigation. The filing cites legal precedent and states that the subpoena recipient is already aware of the information in question.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan Honorable (Judge)
The document is addressed to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan.
Ms. Maxwell
A party in the legal case who is seeking to file materials under seal.
Kerik
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Kerik'.
Palmieri
Mentioned in a case citation reference 'see also Palmieri'.

Organizations (7)

Name Type Context
State of New York government agency
Mentioned in the case citation 'v. State of New York'.
Abbott Laboratories company
A party in the case citation 'Abbott Laboratories v. Adelphia Supply USA'.
Adelphia Supply USA company
A party in the case citation 'Abbott Laboratories v. Adelphia Supply USA'.
United States Government government agency
Referred to as 'the Government', it is the opposing party in the legal matter, making arguments against Ms. Maxwell's...
Second Circuit judicial body
Mentioned in a legal citation and a quote regarding the enforcement of protective orders.
S.D.N.Y. judicial body
Abbreviation for the Southern District of New York, mentioned in multiple case citations.
DOJ government agency
Implied by the footer 'DOJ-OGR-00019576', likely referring to the Department of Justice.

Timeline (1 events)

2020-08-24
A legal document was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, arguing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell's request to file materials under seal.
S.D.N.Y.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as 'State of New York' and in the court designation 'S.D.N.Y.' (Southern District of New York).

Relationships (1)

Ms. Maxwell adversarial (legal) United States Government
The document presents arguments on behalf of Ms. Maxwell against the position taken by 'the Government' in a legal proceeding.

Key Quotes (4)

"In the Second Circuit, there is a presumption in favor of enforcing protective orders against grand jury subpoenas."
Source
— Abbott Laboratories v. Adelphia Supply USA case ruling (Cited as legal precedent to support an argument.)
DOJ-OGR-00019576.jpg
Quote #1
"Confidential"
Source
— The Government (The government's description of the materials at issue, which the author of this document is refuting.)
DOJ-OGR-00019576.jpg
Quote #2
"full scope and details"
Source
— The Government (Part of the government's reasoning for why materials are confidential, quoted by the author.)
DOJ-OGR-00019576.jpg
Quote #3
"have not been made public"
Source
— The Government (Part of the government's reasoning for why materials are confidential, quoted by the author.)
DOJ-OGR-00019576.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document