DOJ-OGR-00021040.jpg
588 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
588 KB
Summary
This legal document is a judicial analysis regarding the sentencing of a defendant. The judge concludes that the evidence, including message pads, does not sufficiently prove the offense continued after November 1, 2004, and therefore the 2003 sentencing guidelines must apply instead of the 2004 guidelines. The judge then begins to address the defendant's objections to specific sentencing enhancements under the 2003 guidelines, confirming that the requirements for an enhancement under 4B1.5(b) have been met.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein |
Mentioned in the context of 'Epstein's house' as a location relevant to the case timeline.
|
|
| Carolyn |
Mentioned as a person whose 18th birthday is a key temporal marker for the alleged conspiracy. A message pad is dated...
|
|
| defendant | Defendant |
The subject of the legal analysis, whose sentencing guidelines and enhancements are being determined. The document di...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| government | Government agency |
Mentioned for its reliance on two additional message pads as evidence.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the document, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (4 events)
2004-11-01
A judge is determining whether the offense continued after November 1, 2004, to decide which sentencing guidelines (2003 or 2004) apply.
2005-03-01
A message pad, used as evidence, is dated March 1, 2005, which is noted as falling outside the scope of the alleged conspiracy.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as a location related to the events of the case, specifically before November 2004.
|
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document