HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012374.jpg
2.29 MB
Extraction Summary
2
People
5
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Governmental legal analysis / legislative commentary
File Size:
2.29 MB
Summary
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis objecting to three sections of a proposed anti-trafficking act. The DOJ argues against Section 107 on separation of powers grounds, Section 108 for proposing a logistically difficult and insecure interagency database, and Section 109 for interfering with the President's policy-making authority. The document is part of a larger collection labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' but does not contain any specific information about Jeffrey Epstein or related individuals.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| President | President of the United States |
Mentioned in Section 109, which would authorize the President to establish an award for efforts against trafficking. ...
|
| Secretary of State | Head of the U.S. Department of State |
Mentioned in Section 107 in the context of providing 'credible evidence' to congressional committees to extend a coun...
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Department / DOJ (Department of Justice) |
The authoring organization of this analysis, objecting to several sections of a proposed act related to trafficking.
|
|
| United States Government |
The document states that a proposed standard would require the U.S. Government to evaluate itself.
|
|
| Congress |
The document discusses the separation of powers between the executive branch and Congress, particularly regarding Con...
|
|
| Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking |
Mentioned in Section 108 as the source of data for a proposed, but opposed, centralized database.
|
|
| HOUSE_OVERSIGHT |
Appears in the footer (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012374), suggesting the document is part of a collection for the House Oversig...
|
Timeline (1 events)
Not specified
The Department of Justice voices objections to Sections 107, 108, and 109 of a proposed act amending trafficking laws.
Not applicable
Department of Justice
Relationships (1)
Executive Branch (DOJ, President, Secretary of State)
→
Constitutional Conflict (Separation of Powers)
→
Legislative Branch (Congress)
The document details DOJ's objections to legislative proposals (Sections 107, 109) that it believes improperly infringe upon the executive's authority to execute laws and make policy.
Key Quotes (4)
""[w]hether the government has made serious and sustained efforts to reduce demand for commercial sex acts and for participation in international sex tourism by nationals of the country.""Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012374.jpg
Quote #1
""unless the Secretary of State provides to the appropriate congressional committees credible evidence that" the country had taken certain steps..."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012374.jpg
Quote #2
""[O]nce Congress makes its choice in enacting legislation, its participation ends. Congress can thereafter control the execution of its enactment only indirectly—by passing new legislation""Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012374.jpg
Quote #3
""combining all applicable data collected by each Federal department and agency represented on the Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking.""Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012374.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document