DOJ-OGR-00019654.jpg
767 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
767 KB
Summary
This legal document, part of an appeal, argues against the government's position that Ms. Maxwell must wait until after her criminal trial to challenge certain judicial decisions. The filing asserts that the current appeal is the correct and only time to review Judge Preska's unsealing order from a related civil case, as a panel in the criminal case would lack jurisdiction. It also refutes the government's claim that a post-judgment appeal would be an effective remedy for premature unsealing of materials.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Subject of criminal and civil cases, whose legal arguments are being presented.
|
| Judge Preska | Judge |
Judge who entered unsealing orders in a civil case involving Ms. Maxwell.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Judge presiding over the criminal case against Ms. Maxwell.
|
| Giuffre | Plaintiff |
Party in the civil case against Maxwell, cited as 'Giuffre v. Maxwell'.
|
| Caparros |
A party in the case 'United States v. Caparros', cited as a legal precedent.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The government | Government agency |
The opposing party in the legal arguments, likely representing the prosecution.
|
| 2d Cir. | Court |
Referenced in a case citation (United States v. Caparros, 800 F.2d 23 (2d Cir. 1986)), indicating the United States C...
|
| This Court | Court |
The court to which this document is being submitted, which is hearing an appeal.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Appeal of Judge Preska's unsealing order in the civil case Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413.
This Court
Criminal case against Ms. Maxwell, presided over by Judge Nathan.
A potential post-trial appeal where Ms. Maxwell could challenge the government's conduct.
Relationships (2)
The document details legal arguments between Ms. Maxwell's counsel and the government in a criminal case.
The document references the civil case 'Giuffre v. Maxwell'.
Key Quotes (2)
"[t]o the extent Maxwell still wishes to use materials she obtained through criminal discovery for other purposes after entry of final judgment in the criminal case, she can seek authorization from this Court to do so then."Source
— The government
(Quoted from the government's argument (Ans.Br. 17) in a footnote, which the author of this document is rejecting.)
DOJ-OGR-00019654.jpg
Quote #1
"[i]f Maxwell complains that her inability to use criminal discovery materials in civil matters may result in premature unsealing . . . , she can . . . raise [that] claim[] before this Court on appeal after entry of final judgment in her criminal case."Source
— The government
(Quoted from the government's argument (Ans.Br. 17) to illustrate a misunderstanding of the relief Ms. Maxwell seeks.)
DOJ-OGR-00019654.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document