DOJ-OGR-00022075.jpg
683 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
683 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on April 24, 2020, is a portion of a government motion arguing that it has fulfilled its discovery obligations to a defendant named Thomas. The government asserts it has complied with legal standards, including Rule 16 and the Brady rule, by providing substantial evidence, such as hundreds of hours of video surveillance, well in advance of the trial.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Thomas | Defendant |
Mentioned in the heading "Thomas is Not Entitled to Additional Materials" as the subject of the legal argument.
|
| Brady |
Referenced in the context of the 'Brady rule' from a legal precedent concerning the disclosure of impeachment material.
|
|
| Stevens |
Referenced in the case citation 'United States v. Stevens', which provides a definition for material evidence.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government | Government agency |
Referred to as the prosecuting party in the legal case, with discovery and disclosure obligations.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2019-07-05
The Government produced hundreds of hours of video surveillance footage dating back to July 5, 2019, as part of its discovery obligations.
The Government
defendants
Relationships (1)
The document outlines the Government's legal position against the defendant, Thomas, regarding the fulfillment of discovery obligations in a criminal case.
Key Quotes (2)
"material to preparing the defense"Source
— Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 16
(A standard from Rule 16 defining items that the Government must permit defendants to inspect and copy.)
DOJ-OGR-00022075.jpg
Quote #1
"if it could be used to counter the Government’s case or bolster a defense."Source
— United States v. Stevens
(A quote from a court case that further defines what is considered "material to preparing the defense" under Rule 16.)
DOJ-OGR-00022075.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document