DOJ-OGR-00005503.jpg
736 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
736 KB
Summary
This legal document is a filing by the defense in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, arguing against a government motion to limit questioning about prior investigations in Florida and New York. The defense asserts that questioning case agents on the scope, timeline, and steps of these investigations is relevant and admissible evidence. The defense distinguishes its request from seeking information on 'investigative techniques' to justify its line of questioning.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| case agents | Investigator |
Mentioned as individuals the defense wishes to question about prior investigations.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the government | government agency |
The prosecuting party in the legal case, which has filed a motion to preclude the defense from questioning about prio...
|
Timeline (2 events)
A prior investigation conducted in Florida, about which the defense seeks to question case agents.
Florida
A prior investigation conducted in New York, about which the defense seeks to question case agents.
New York
Relationships (1)
The document is a legal argument by the defense against a motion filed by the government, indicating they are opposing parties in a legal case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
Key Quotes (3)
"investigative steps"Source
— the government
(A term the government is allegedly conflating with 'investigative techniques' to restrict the defense's questioning.)
DOJ-OGR-00005503.jpg
Quote #1
"investigative techniques"Source
— the government
(A term the defense clarifies they are not seeking testimony about, distinguishing it from 'investigative steps'.)
DOJ-OGR-00005503.jpg
Quote #2
"concerning the scope, timeline, and resolution of the investigation, as well as the various investigative steps taken by the agents"Source
— the defense
(Quoted from the defense's Touhy letter, specifying the testimony requested from case agents.)
DOJ-OGR-00005503.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document