DOJ-OGR-00010089.jpg
430 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
430 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript from a legal deposition where a witness named Edelstein is being questioned about the timeline of their knowledge concerning certain facts. Edelstein clarifies that their understanding of the situation evolved, distinguishing between what was known on May 12th and what was known later when writing a legal brief. The testimony reveals that a letter received by Edelstein prompted an investigation into the matter.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edelstein | Witness/Deponent |
The individual being questioned in the transcript, providing answers (A).
|
| Theresa Trzaskoma |
Mentioned as someone who had previously learned certain facts through an investigation.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Relationships (1)
Edelstein is being questioned about his knowledge of facts that Theresa Trzaskoma had previously learned through an investigation, indicating a connection related to the case or matter at hand.
Key Quotes (2)
"What I was trying to distinguish was what I knew on May 12th, versus what I knew by the time we were writing the brief."Source
— Edelstein
(Explaining the difference in his state of knowledge at two different points in time regarding the facts in question.)
DOJ-OGR-00010089.jpg
Quote #1
"...when I received the letter it caused us concern and prompted us to investigate."Source
— Edelstein
(Describing the catalyst for an investigation into the matter being discussed.)
DOJ-OGR-00010089.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document