DOJ-OGR-00010058.jpg
415 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
415 KB
Summary
This document is page 318 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cv-00438-DAO) filed on August 24, 2022. It features testimony from Ms. Brune under redirect examination by Ms. Davis, discussing legal ethics regarding whether an attorney should raise non-meritorious arguments if the government omits them. Ms. Brune asserts she would disclose facts or arguments if put in issue by the Court or government.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Brune | Witness / Attorney |
Under recross and redirect examination; discussing legal ethics and disclosure.
|
| Ms. Davis | Attorney |
Conducting redirect examination of Ms. Brune.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings.
|
| Mr. Schectman | Attorney |
Mentioned by the Court as a potential questioner.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| The Government |
Referenced by witness regarding legal arguments and issues raised.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on court reporter name (likely SDNY).
|
Key Quotes (3)
"But if nobody ever raised it, I don't think that I would have even been acting ethically if I said on behalf of my client, hey, here's an argument I don't even think is meritorious but the government has omitted to raise it so I on the defense side will raise it."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010058.jpg
Quote #1
"If it was put in issue by the Court or by the government, I would have done and in fact did do what I did."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010058.jpg
Quote #2
"What I'm trying to say is, I would have laid it out, which is what I did."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010058.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document