DOJ-OGR-00009888.jpg
750 KB
Extraction Summary
10
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
750 KB
Summary
This legal document, part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, argues that a prospective juror, identified as Juror No. 50, provided deliberately false answers during the jury selection process (voir dire). The filing asserts that the juror, who was a victim of a sex crime as a child, intentionally lied about his past to avoid being disqualified from a trial concerning alleged sexual misconduct with minors. The document cites various legal precedents to support its claims about juror partiality and the implications of false answers.
People (10)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | Prospective Juror |
The subject of the legal argument, accused of providing deliberately false answers during voir dire.
|
| McDonough |
Cited in legal precedent (McDonough, 464 U.S. at 556-57).
|
|
| Langford |
Cited in legal precedent (Langford, 990 F.2d at 68).
|
|
| Stewart |
Cited in legal precedent (Stewart, 433 F.3d at 303).
|
|
| Greer |
Cited in legal precedent (Greer, 285 F.3d at 173).
|
|
| Martinez-Salazar |
Cited in legal precedent (Martinez-Salazar, 528 U.S. at 316).
|
|
| Blackmun, J. | Justice |
Cited in a concurring opinion in the McDonough case.
|
| Brennan, J. | Justice |
Cited in a concurring opinion in the McDonough case.
|
| Smith |
Cited in legal precedent (Smith, 455 U.S. at 215-16).
|
|
| O'Connor, J. | Justice |
Cited in a concurring opinion.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| DOJ-OGR | government agency |
Appears in the footer of the document (DOJ-OGR-00009888).
|
Timeline (1 events)
A prospective juror, Juror No. 50, allegedly gave deliberately false answers during voir dire for a case involving sexual misconduct with minors. The juror, a childhood victim of a sex crime, is accused of lying to avoid disqualification.
Key Quotes (4)
"deliberateness"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009888.jpg
Quote #1
"particular lies [may] evidence[] partiality"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009888.jpg
Quote #2
"Yes."Source
— Juror No. 50
(The answer the document argues Juror No. 50 should have given to Question 25, and the answer he allegedly avoided giving.)
DOJ-OGR-00009888.jpg
Quote #3
"[A]n analysis of bias is required even if the juror’s erroneous response was deliberate."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009888.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document