DOJ-OGR-00010244.jpg

637 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 637 KB
Summary

This document is page 29 of a court transcript filed on March 11, 2022, from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that a juror's history of sexual abuse (involving a stepbrother and a friend) is relevant to establishing bias, as it may align with victim testimony heard during the trial. The Court denies Everdell's request to ask the juror specific questions about their therapy and trauma, citing that the defense failed to propose comparable questions during the original jury selection (voir dire).

People (3)

Name Role Context
Mr. Everdell Defense Attorney
Arguing for permission to ask specific follow-up questions to a juror regarding their history of sexual abuse and the...
The Court Judge
Presiding over the hearing; denies Everdell's request to ask proposed questions because comparable questions were not...
Juror (Unnamed) Subject of Inquiry
A juror whose history of sexual abuse (involving a stepbrother and a friend) is being discussed in relation to potent...

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Listed in the footer.
DOJ
Implied by the Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
The Defense
Referred to by The Court regarding their proposals during voir dire.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-03-11
Post-trial hearing regarding juror misconduct/bias in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Courtroom (Southern District of New York)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction implied by the court reporter's name (Southern District of New York).

Relationships (1)

Mr. Everdell Attorney-Judge The Court
Dialogue in transcript where Everdell argues a motion and The Court rules on it.

Key Quotes (3)

"The defense did not propose any comparable questions for jurors during the voir dire process who indicated yes to this question and indicated a history of sexual abuse, so those requests are denied."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010244.jpg
Quote #1
"I'm not trying to get into these gory details, but it is relevant, the extent of the similarities of this juror's abuse and whether that lines up with the testimony we heard from the victims is relevant in an inquiry to bias."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010244.jpg
Quote #2
"Does it involve addressing this issue of prior child sexual abuse? Were you in therapy during the trial?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010244.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document