DOJ-OGR-00010115.jpg
457 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
457 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript showing the cross-examination of a witness named Berke by an attorney, Mr. Okula. Mr. Okula poses a hypothetical question about what steps Berke would take if he discovered that a juror, specifically Juror No. 1, was a suspended attorney named Catherine Conrad. Berke refuses to answer the question, stating it is a far-fetched and speculative scenario that he has never experienced.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Berke | Witness |
A witness being cross-examined by Mr. Okula.
|
| Catherine Conrad | Suspended Attorney / Potential Juror |
Mentioned in a hypothetical question as a suspended attorney who might be serving as Juror No. 1.
|
| Mr. Okula | Attorney |
The attorney conducting the cross-examination of the witness, Berke.
|
| Judge | Judge |
Addressed by Mr. Okula at the conclusion of his questioning.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
Key Quotes (2)
"You're asking me to speculate and give opinions about an experience I've never had."Source
— Berke
(The witness's reason for refusing to answer Mr. Okula's hypothetical question about a juror being a suspended attorney.)
DOJ-OGR-00010115.jpg
Quote #1
"Judge, I have no further questions for Mr. Berke."Source
— MR. OKULA
(The attorney's statement concluding his cross-examination of the witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00010115.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document