DOJ-OGR-00021114.jpg
599 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / appellate brief
File Size:
599 KB
Summary
This page is from a legal brief (Case 22-1426) filed on Feb 28, 2023. It argues primarily against the retroactive application of the PROTECT Act (specifically 18 U.S.C. § 3283 regarding the statute of limitations for child abuse). The text cites legal precedents (Diehl, Coutentos) to argue that the District Court erred in its interpretation of the statute's retroactivity concerning the April 2003 amendment.
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals |
Cited as having interpreted § 3283 through a categorical lens.
|
|
| District Court |
The lower court whose decision is being argued against/appealed.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by the Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2003-04-30
Amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283 extending the statute of limitations for the life of the accuser.
US Law
Key Quotes (3)
"Thus, we conclude that § 3283 is inapplicable...."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021114.jpg
Quote #1
"The District Court erred in applying § 3283 retroactively"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021114.jpg
Quote #2
"Contrary to what the District Court held, the 2003 amendment was not retroactive."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021114.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document