DOJ-OGR-00008913.jpg

739 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order / legal filing
File Size: 739 KB
Summary

This document is Page 5 of a Court Order filed on February 11, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Court outlines schedules for docketing redacted filings and explicitly denies a motion by 'Juror 50' to intervene in the case regarding a post-verdict inquiry into alleged false voir dire responses. The document also references a motion by the New York Times Company to unseal juror questionnaires.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Juror 50 Juror / Movant
Subject of a motion to intervene regarding a post-verdict inquiry into allegedly false voir dire responses; motion de...
Defendant Defendant
Party ordered to docket exhibits; opposes Juror 50's motion. (Implies Ghislaine Maxwell based on case number).
The Court Judge/Judiciary
Issues the order denying intervention and managing redactions.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Government
Prosecution; opposes Juror 50's motion.
New York Times Company
Filed a motion to unseal filled-out questionnaires for the twelve seated jurors.
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated in Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (2 events)

2022-02-11
Court Order Filed
Court (SDNY implied by Case ID)
2022-02-16
Deadline for Order via email regarding redactions
N/A

Relationships (2)

Juror 50 Legal Subject The Court
Court denies Juror 50's motion to intervene in post-verdict inquiry.
Juror 50 Subject of Media Motion New York Times Company
NYT motion to unseal questionnaires includes Juror 50's questionnaire.

Key Quotes (4)

"The Court denies the motion."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008913.jpg
Quote #1
"Juror 50 cites no authority to support a juror’s intervention when he will possibly be subject to a post-verdict inquiry."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008913.jpg
Quote #2
"Although cases do support that a juror should have legal counsel in a post-verdict inquiry into allegedly false voir dire responses, as Juror 50 does have, no cases support intervention."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008913.jpg
Quote #3
"Exhibit 1 to the Defendant’s motion, which is Juror 50’s completed questionnaire, is to be maintained temporarily under seal..."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008913.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document