DOJ-OGR-00017239.jpg
618 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
618 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on August 10, 2022, is a portion of a charge or jury instruction concerning Ms. Maxwell. It defines the terms 'knowingly and willfully' and explains that for a conviction on a conspiracy charge, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Ms. Maxwell consciously intended to join and further an unlawful operation. The text instructs that since one cannot directly know a person's thoughts, the jury must infer knowledge and intent from evidence, such as alleged conversations involving Ms. Maxwell.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Subject of legal proceedings |
Mentioned throughout the document as the individual whose knowledge and intent regarding a criminal conspiracy are be...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned as the entity with the 'burden of proof' to demonstrate Ms. Maxwell's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, indicating they are the court reporting service that transcribed the document.
|
Timeline (1 events)
A charge or jury instruction defining the legal standards of 'knowingly and willfully' in the context of a conspiracy charge against Ms. Maxwell.
Key Quotes (2)
"To satisfy its burden of proof that Ms. Maxwell willfully and knowingly became a member of a conspiracy to accomplish an unlawful purpose, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt Ms. Maxwell knew that she was a member of an operation or conspiracy to accomplish that unlawful purpose..."Source
— Unknown (likely judge or attorney)
(This quote outlines the specific legal requirements the government must meet to prove Ms. Maxwell's guilt in the conspiracy charge.)
DOJ-OGR-00017239.jpg
Quote #1
"Science has not yet devised a manner of looking into a person's mind and knowing what that person is thinking."Source
— Unknown (likely judge or attorney)
(This statement is used to explain to the jury that knowledge and intent must be inferred from evidence and actions, as direct access to a person's thoughts is impossible.)
DOJ-OGR-00017239.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document