DOJ-OGR-00021534.jpg

811 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
6
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 811 KB
Summary

This legal document is a court order denying a defendant's request for an evidentiary hearing to examine Juror 50 and other jurors. The defendant's motion was based on Juror 50's social media activity and post-trial statements, as well as a New York Times article alleging another juror had also been a victim of sexual abuse. The Court found the evidence insufficient, deemed the request a "fishing expedition," and took steps to protect juror privacy from media contact and legal inquiry.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Juror 50 Juror
Subject of a defense request for an evidentiary hearing regarding his social media usage and post-trial statements.
Maxwell Defendant
The defendant in the case who is seeking to examine jurors.
Moon
Cited in a legal case (Moon, 718 F.2d at 1234).
Moten
Cited in a legal case (United States v. Moten, 582 F.2d 654, 667).
Ianniello
Cited in a legal case (See Ianniello, 866 F.2d at 543).

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The Court Government agency
The judicial body presiding over the case, which denies the Defendant's request.
New York Times Company
Published an article stating a second juror was sexually abused as a minor, which is part of the basis for the Defend...
Instagram Company
Social media platform used by Juror 50.

Timeline (6 events)

2021-12-30
Court staff notified all jurors via email about a reporter approaching a juror.
chambers staff all jurors
2021-12-31
The Court informed the parties by sealed order that a juror had been approached by a reporter.
The Court the parties
2022-01
Juror 50 posted on his Instagram account after the completion of the trial.
Instagram
2022-01-05
A juror replied to the court staff's email regarding news reports about Juror 50.
a juror court staff
2022-01-06
The Court informed the parties of the juror's communications by sealed order.
The Court the parties
2022-01-13
The Defendant requested the juror communications, which the Court denied without prejudice.
The Defendant The Court

Relationships (2)

Maxwell Legal (Adversarial) Juror 50
The Defendant (Maxwell) is seeking to examine Juror 50 in an evidentiary hearing, a request which the Court denies.
The Court Professional (Protective) jurors
The Court is denying requests to examine jurors and redacting juror information to protect their privacy and prevent harassment.

Key Quotes (2)

"[p]ersonal stuff, like selfies."
Source
— Juror 50 (Juror 50's description of the content on his social media accounts.)
DOJ-OGR-00021534.jpg
Quote #1
"a fishing expedition"
Source
— The Court (The Court's characterization of the Defendant's request to examine Juror 50's social media usage.)
DOJ-OGR-00021534.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document