DOJ-OGR-00021843.jpg
699 KB
Extraction Summary
10
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
699 KB
Summary
This legal document argues for limiting the application of the 'Annabi' doctrine. It contends that this doctrine, from the Second Circuit, should not apply to a plea agreement originating in the Eleventh Circuit, where precedent dictates that ambiguities are resolved against the government. The document also asserts that the Annabi doctrine should only be applied when new charges are 'sufficiently distinct' from the original ones.
People (10)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ziglar |
Cited in the legal case Ziglar v. Abbasi.
|
|
| Abbasi |
Cited in the legal case Ziglar v. Abbasi.
|
|
| Annabi |
Referenced as the source of a legal doctrine from a specific case.
|
|
| Jefferies |
Cited in the legal case U.S. v. Jefferies.
|
|
| Arnett |
Cited in the legal case In re Arnett.
|
|
| Rowe |
Cited in the legal case Rowe v. Griffin.
|
|
| Griffin |
Cited in the legal case Rowe v. Griffin.
|
|
| Gebbie |
Cited in the legal case Gebbie.
|
|
| Van Thournout |
Cited in the legal case Van Thournout.
|
|
| Harvey |
Cited in the legal case Harvey.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | government agency |
Referenced in the context of Eleventh Circuit precedent regarding ambiguity in plea agreements, specifically the phra...
|
| Second Circuit | government agency |
A U.S. judicial circuit where the Annabi doctrine originated and is contrasted with the Eleventh Circuit.
|
| Eleventh Circuit | government agency |
A U.S. judicial circuit where the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) originated and whose precedent is argued to be cont...
|
Timeline (1 events)
An argument is made that the Annabi doctrine should be limited in its application, specifically that it should not apply to plea agreements from the Eleventh Circuit and should only apply when new charges are sufficiently distinct from old ones.
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The document argues that the Annabi doctrine should not apply to pleas originating outside this circuit.
|
|
|
The location where the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) originated and whose legal precedent is being discussed.
|
Key Quotes (4)
"a disfavored judicial activity"Source
— Ziglar v. Abbasi
(Quoted to describe the act of expanding a doctrinally flawed legal principle into new contexts.)
DOJ-OGR-00021843.jpg
Quote #1
"must be read against the government."Source
— U.S. v. Jefferies
(A quote describing the Eleventh Circuit's precedent on how to resolve ambiguity in plea agreements.)
DOJ-OGR-00021843.jpg
Quote #2
"the new charges are sufficiently distinct"Source
— Annabi case
(A condition cited from the Annabi case for when its doctrine should apply.)
DOJ-OGR-00021843.jpg
Quote #3
"sufficiently distinct"Source
— Annabi case
(A clarification from the Annabi case that charges are distinct when they cover a different or expanded period of time.)
DOJ-OGR-00021843.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document