DOJ-OGR-00009159.jpg

752 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
0
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 752 KB
Summary

This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against holding an evidentiary hearing to question a jury based on an anonymous, hearsay report. It cites legal precedent from cases like *United States v. Stewart* and *United States v. Guzman Loera* to assert that a high standard of evidence is required for such a hearing, which anonymous tips do not meet. The document details the *Guzman Loera* case as an example where a court denied a hearing despite allegations of juror misconduct published in a magazine article.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Stewart Party in a legal case
Mentioned as a party in the case citations 'Stewart, 590 F.3d at 133-34' and 'United States v. Stewart, 317 F. Supp. ...
Guzman Loera Party in a legal case
Mentioned as the defendant in the case 'United States v. Guzman Loera'.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Second Circuit Government agency
Referenced as a court that has repeatedly found a hearing is not necessary on similar facts and affirmed a lower cour...
United States Government agency
Mentioned as a party in the legal cases 'United States v. Stewart' and 'United States v. Guzman Loera'.

Timeline (2 events)

The trial in the case of United States v. Guzman Loera, where the jury was repeatedly instructed to avoid media coverage.
district court
Guzman Loera jurors district court judge
The document discusses the legal standard for when a hearing to question a jury is warranted, arguing against one in the current case.
court
jurors

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in the case citation 'Stewart, 317 F. Supp. 2d 432, 443 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)'.

Key Quotes (2)

"clear, strong, substantial and incontrovertible evidence that a specific, non-speculative impropriety has occurred."
Source
— Stewart, 590 F.3d at 133-34 (The legal standard required to warrant a hearing to question a jury.)
DOJ-OGR-00009159.jpg
Quote #1
"Gossip and anonymous tips do not satisfy this standard."
Source
— United States v. Stewart, 317 F. Supp. 2d 432, 443 (Clarifying what kind of evidence is insufficient to meet the standard for a hearing.)
DOJ-OGR-00009159.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document