DOJ-OGR-00019137.jpg
545 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
545 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between the judge, a government attorney (Ms. Moe), and another attorney (Mr. Pagliuca). The attorneys and the judge debate the proper way to present documentary evidence to the jury, specifically whether it can be done without a witness on the stand. Mr. Pagliuca objects to the government's proposed method, and the judge expresses concern that it would be improper.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
Speaking to the court about the process of presenting evidence to the jury.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the case, questioning the attorneys about the proposed procedure for presenting evidence.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney |
Expressing confusion and objection to the government's proposed method of presenting evidence without a witness.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| government | Government agency |
Referred to as the party wishing to publish documents and present evidence to the jury.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion in court regarding the procedural method for the government to present exhibits to the jury without a witness on the stand.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (3)
Ms. Moe addresses the judge as 'Your Honor' and proposes a procedure for the trial, indicating an attorney-judge relationship.
Mr. Pagliuca addresses the judge as 'your Honor' and objects to a proposed trial procedure, indicating an attorney-judge relationship.
They are on opposing sides of a procedural argument in court. Ms. Moe, representing the government's position, suggests a method that Mr. Pagliuca then objects to.
Key Quotes (3)
"But the witness is providing testimony over which they have no personal knowledge. You're simply asking them to do the work of the government in the closing."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge's response to Ms. Moe's suggestion about using a witness to guide the jury through exhibits, expressing concern about the nature of such testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00019137.jpg
Quote #1
"I don't understand that process, I guess, your Honor."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Expressing confusion and seeking clarification about the government's proposal to present documents to the jury without a witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00019137.jpg
Quote #2
"I do object to that process, your"Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Formally objecting to the procedure of having the government direct the jury to look at exhibits without a witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00019137.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document