DOJ-OGR-00019364.jpg
708 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
708 KB
Summary
This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing against a motion from a defendant named Maxwell to consolidate her criminal and civil appeals. The Government asserts that Maxwell's motion is a strategic attempt to circumvent an order by Judge Nathan that restricts the use of criminal discovery materials in her civil litigation. The filing warns that consolidating the cases would effectively reverse the judge's order without a proper appeal and raises concerns about disseminating sensitive, sealed criminal documents to civil litigants.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Judge Nathan | Presiding District Judge |
Mentioned as the judge presiding over Maxwell's criminal case and the author of an Order that is the subject of an ap...
|
| Maxwell | Litigant |
A party in a criminal and civil case who has filed a motion to consolidate appeals and is the subject of Judge Nathan...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | Government agency |
A party in the criminal case against Maxwell, opposing her motion to consolidate appeals.
|
| The Court | Judicial body |
The judicial body being addressed in the filing, which is being asked to deny Maxwell's motion.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Judge Nathan issued an Order prohibiting Maxwell from using certain criminal discovery materials in civil litigation.
The Court
Maxwell filed a motion to modify the Protective Order, which was denied by Judge Nathan.
The Court
Relationships (2)
Judge Nathan is the presiding judge in Maxwell's criminal case and has issued rulings and an Order affecting Maxwell, which Maxwell is now appealing.
The Government is the opposing party to Maxwell in a criminal case and is arguing against a motion she has filed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document