DOJ-OGR-00021734.jpg
696 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
0
Organizations
2
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
696 KB
Summary
This legal document, part of an appeal (Case 22-1426), argues against Ghislaine Maxwell's interpretation of a jury note from her trial. The prosecution contends the jury's question about her guilt based on events in New Mexico was a valid inquiry into her intent, not a misunderstanding of the law. The document also refutes Maxwell's claim of insufficient evidence regarding her arrangement of a victim's (Jane's) return flight from New Mexico, suggesting the jury could have reasonably convicted her on that basis despite a lack of specific documentary proof.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned throughout the document as the subject of the legal arguments, accused of transporting 'Jane' and arranging...
|
| Jane | Victim/Witness |
Mentioned as the person who was transported, experienced sexual abuse, and whose travel to New York and return flight...
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Mentioned as the judge at the trial to whom defense counsel raised a question.
|
Timeline (4 events)
The trial of Maxwell, where Jane testified, defense counsel raised questions to Judge Nathan, and the jury deliberated and sent a note.
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where sexual activity occurred and from which a return flight for 'Jane' was allegedly arranged by Maxwell.
|
|
|
Destination of 'Jane's' travel where ensuing sexual abuse occurred.
|
Relationships (2)
The document discusses Maxwell's alleged role in transporting Jane for the purpose of sexual abuse and arranging her travel.
The document states that the defense counsel repeatedly raised a question to Judge Nathan during the trial.
Key Quotes (4)
"significant or motivating purpose"Source
— Legal argument
(Used to describe the legal standard for prostitution in relation to interstate transportation.)
DOJ-OGR-00021734.jpg
Quote #1
"can be found guilty"Source
— Jury
(Part of a question from the jury to the court regarding Maxwell's guilt if a certain fact is true.)
DOJ-OGR-00021734.jpg
Quote #2
"[T]he jury likely believed that if they found Maxwell had some role in arranging Jane's return flight from New Mexico, after the sexual abuse had already taken place, they could convict her on the substantive transportation count . . ."Source
— Author of brief (Br.79-80)
(A quote from a legal brief speculating on the jury's reasoning for conviction.)
DOJ-OGR-00021734.jpg
Quote #3
"no evidence"Source
— Defense
(Part of the defense argument stating there was no evidence Maxwell arranged a return flight from New Mexico (Tr.3133).)
DOJ-OGR-00021734.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document