DOJ-OGR-00013224.jpg
470 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
470 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It records a conversation between an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The judge sustains a series of objections raised by Mr. Pagliuca, referencing specific paragraph numbers from another document.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| PAGLIUCA | Mr. |
Speaker in the transcript, likely an attorney, addressing the court and listing objections.
|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the person being cross-examined ("Carolyn - cross").
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, responding to Mr. Pagliuca and ruling on objections.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Relationships (2)
Formal dialogue between an attorney and a judge during a court proceeding.
The document header indicates Mr. Pagliuca is conducting a cross-examination of Carolyn, which is an adversarial process in a legal context.
Key Quotes (1)
"If they are all on that same theory, then you can make the record. If there's any different theory of inconsistency, either as to the specific time frame and testimony or to some different inference available, I'll hear it. But otherwise just make the record with respect to the numbered paragraphs."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge providing instructions to Mr. Pagliuca on how to handle a series of similar objections.)
DOJ-OGR-00013224.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document