HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013157.jpg
2.3 MB
Extraction Summary
1
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Academic paper / book excerpt (house oversight evidence)
File Size:
2.3 MB
Summary
This document appears to be a page from a technical paper or book regarding Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) ethics and development strategies. It argues for the co-advancement of software and ethics and suggests that starting AGI development sooner rather than later is safer to prevent dangerous outpacing of ethical theory. It references the 'CogPrime project' and bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it was produced as evidence in a congressional investigation (likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's funding of AI researchers).
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Authors | Researchers/Writers |
Self-referenced in the text as working on the CogPrime project.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| CogPrime project |
An AGI development project mentioned as the authors' current work.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Inferred from the footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
Key Quotes (3)
"Somewhat ironically, it seems the best way to ensure that AGI development proceeds at a relatively measured pace is to initiate serious AGI development sooner rather than later."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013157.jpg
Quote #1
"Of course, the authors are doing their best in this direction via their work on the CogPrime project!"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013157.jpg
Quote #2
"We really want both deep-sharing GB technology and AGI technology to evolve relatively rapidly, compared to computing hardware and advanced CS algorithms"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013157.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document