DOJ-OGR-00021715.jpg
644 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
644 KB
Summary
This legal document details the District Court's decision, specifically Judge Nathan's denial of Maxwell's motion for a new trial. Judge Nathan's ruling was based on her assessment of Juror 50's testimony during a hearing, where she found his answers credible and concluded that his personal experiences did not compromise his impartiality, and that he would not have been struck for cause.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Examined Juror 50, denied Maxwell's motion for a new trial, and provided a detailed written opinion on her decision.
|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
Was examined by Judge Nathan regarding his experiences and ability to be impartial. His testimony was central to the ...
|
| Maxwell | Defendant (implied) |
Filed a motion for a new trial which was denied by Judge Nathan.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The District Court | government agency |
The court whose decision to deny Maxwell's motion is being described.
|
Timeline (2 events)
A hearing where Judge Nathan examined Juror 50 in detail about his experiences and ability to be an impartial juror.
The District Court
Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's motion for a new trial in a detailed written opinion.
The District Court
Relationships (2)
Judge Nathan examined Juror 50 during a hearing and assessed the credibility of his testimony.
Judge Nathan presided over Maxwell's case and denied her motion for a new trial.
Key Quotes (1)
"Juror 50’s credible responses [to those questions] under oath at the hearing established that he would not have been struck for cause if he had provided accurate responses to the questionnaire."Source
— Judge Nathan
(Part of Judge Nathan's conclusion in her written opinion explaining why she would not have granted a for-cause challenge to Juror 50.)
DOJ-OGR-00021715.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document