DOJ-OGR-00009966.jpg
1.02 MB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Index to a court transcript
File Size:
1.02 MB
Summary
This document is a page from an index for a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, from the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. The page covers keywords from 'hardcopies' to 'information' and lists the corresponding page and line numbers where they appear in the full transcript. The document was prepared by Southern District Reporters and includes case and document identification numbers.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| PAUL M. DAUGERDAS | Defendant |
Named in the case title 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,'
|
| Hillary |
Listed as an index entry, appearing on page 77, line 2 of the transcript.
|
|
| Hecker |
Listed as an index entry, appearing on page 8, line 19 of the transcript.
|
|
| Hernandez |
Listed as an index entry, appearing 34 times in the transcript.
|
|
| Hollander |
Listed as an index entry, appearing on page 40, line 1 of the transcript.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | Government |
Named as the plaintiff/prosecution in the case title 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,'
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that produced the transcript.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2012-02-15
A court proceeding in the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL., for which this transcript index was created.
Southern District
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS', referring to a U.S. federal judicial district.
|
|
|
Listed as an index entry, appearing on page 162, line 20 of the transcript.
|
Relationships (1)
The document is an index for a court case titled 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,' indicating a legal conflict between the two parties.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document