DOJ-OGR-00021109.jpg
672 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
672 KB
Summary
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues for a specific interpretation of statute § 3283. It cites legal precedents from cases like Bridges, Scharton, and Noveck to support the claim that § 3283 does not modify the statute of limitations for § 2423(a) violations. The document contrasts this with a 2001 action by Congress, which used explicit language to eliminate the statute of limitations for certain terrorism offenses, arguing that Congress knows how to be specific when it intends to be.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Bridges |
Referenced as a party in the case law 'Bridges', which is cited as precedent.
|
|
| Scharton |
Referenced as a party in the case law 'Scharton', which is cited as precedent.
|
|
| Noveck |
Referenced as a party in the case law 'Noveck', which is cited as precedent.
|
|
| Smith |
Referenced as a party in the case law 'Smith v. City of Jackson, Miss.'.
|
|
| Wasser |
Referenced as a party in the case law 'Wasser v. New York State Off. of Vocational & Educational Servs.'.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Congress | government agency |
Mentioned as the legislative body that has shown it knows how to tether a statute of limitations to specific conduct ...
|
| City of Jackson, Miss. | government agency |
Referenced as a party in the case law 'Smith v. City of Jackson, Miss.'.
|
| New York State Off. of Vocational & Educational Servs. | government agency |
Referenced as a party in the case law 'Wasser v. New York State Off. of Vocational & Educational Servs.'.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the case citation 'Smith v. City of Jackson, Miss.'.
|
Key Quotes (4)
"[a] further ground for [its] conclusion"Source
— Bridges case holding
(Describing an alternative holding in the Bridges case.)
DOJ-OGR-00021109.jpg
Quote #1
"fraud"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021109.jpg
Quote #2
"offense-involving"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021109.jpg
Quote #3
"the commission of such offense resulted in, or created a foreseeable risk of, death or serious bodily injury to"Source
— Congress
(Quoted text from a statute where Congress eliminated the statute of limitations for certain terrorism offenses in 2001.)
DOJ-OGR-00021109.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document