DOJ-OGR-00013302.jpg

384 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 384 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Court and prosecutors Mr. Rohrbach and Ms. Comey regarding the admissibility of 'Exhibit 52' and the lack of further witnesses for it. The prosecution plans to submit a letter arguing for the exhibit's admission based on current evidence before the court goes into recess.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Mr. Rohrbach Attorney (Prosecution)
Answering the Judge's questions regarding Exhibit 52 and future filings.
Ms. Comey Attorney (Prosecution)
Answering the Judge's question regarding witnesses for Exhibit 52.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the hearing, asking questions about evidence admissibility.
Defense Counsel Attorneys for the Defendant
Mentioned by the Court as the party Rohrbach must confer with.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
DOJ
Inferred from Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
Court Proceedings regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial)
Courtroom
2022-08-10
Recess
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case number format.

Relationships (2)

Mr. Rohrbach Co-counsel Ms. Comey
Both responding to the court on behalf of the prosecution regarding the same exhibit.
Mr. Rohrbach Opposing Counsel Defense Counsel
Court instructs Rohrbach to confer with defense counsel.

Key Quotes (2)

"We plan to submit a letter tonight in articulating our theory why the Court should admit that exhibit based on the current evidence."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013302.jpg
Quote #1
"Obviously, I reserved based on the representation there would be additional testimony."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013302.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document