DOJ-OGR-00010169.jpg
476 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
476 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript where an attorney, Mr. Shechtman, argues that the government's case against his clients, Pace and Brubaker, incorrectly characterizes actions as 'backdating'. He claims that Deutsche Bank records from February and March were simply marked 'as of' and provided to tax preparers, which is different from the government's portrayal and distinguishes his clients from a government cooperator in the case.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Judge Easterbrook | Judge |
Mentioned by Mr. Shechtman as having an opinion on legal doctrines.
|
| MR. SHECHTMAN | Speaker (likely Attorney) |
The primary speaker on this page, arguing a point to the court.
|
| Mr. Pace | Party to the case |
Mentioned as having been acquitted on most counts and being in a similar situation to Mr. Brubaker.
|
| Mr. Brubaker | Party to the case |
Mentioned as being in a similar situation to Mr. Pace.
|
| Jenkins lawyer | Lawyer |
An unnamed lawyer who dealt with the government cooperator.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judicial body |
Being addressed by Mr. Shechtman.
|
| Kramer Levin | Law Firm |
A law firm that cross-examined the government cooperator.
|
| Deutsche Bank | Company |
The source of bank records central to the 'backdating' argument.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-03-22
Mr. Shechtman presents a legal argument to the court regarding prejudice and the nature of evidence in his clients' case.
Southern District
Deutsche Bank statements for February and March were created and marked with an "as of" date, which is the basis for the government's backdating allegation.
Deutsche Bank
tax preparers
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Appears in the name of the court reporting agency, indicating the location of the court.
|
Relationships (2)
Mr. Shechtman states, 'Mr. Pace is not situated that much differently than Mr. Brubaker' and refers to them collectively as 'these two men'.
The document states that 'the Kramer Levin firm got to cross-examine him'.
Key Quotes (2)
"What distinguishes these two men is the, quote, backdate."Source
— MR. SHECHTMAN
(Explaining the central point of contention in the case against his clients, Mr. Pace and Mr. Brubaker.)
DOJ-OGR-00010169.jpg
Quote #1
"I don't think that's what the Deutsche Bank records show. They are doing these in February and March and putting them on February and March statements and they're putting "as of.""Source
— MR. SHECHTMAN
(Arguing against the government's characterization of the case as involving 'backdating'.)
DOJ-OGR-00010169.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document