DOJ-OGR-00016884.jpg
578 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
578 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between counsel and the judge regarding the need to establish a person's residency at 44 Kinnerton. Counsel mentions a potential new witness, Mr. Moran, and the judge rules that property ownership documents are admissible as evidence to argue the inference of residency.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Moran |
Mentioned as a person who was found to potentially establish someone's residency at 44 Kinnerton.
|
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Counsel/Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, addressing the Court.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Title used to address the judge presiding over the case.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | government agency |
A speaker in the transcript, representing the judiciary.
|
| the government | government agency |
Mentioned as a party in the case that moved to preclude ownership documents.
|
| the defense | legal party |
Mentioned as a party in the case that intended to establish timing of residence.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A legal proceeding where counsel and the judge discuss the introduction of a new witness and the admissibility of ownership documents to infer residency.
Courtroom (implied)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
A property where residency and ownership are being discussed.
|
|
|
The location of property for which ownership documents were moved to be precluded.
|
Relationships (1)
MR. EVERDELL is an attorney arguing a point before THE COURT (the judge) in a formal legal proceeding.
Key Quotes (3)
"The government moved to preclude the ownership documents on Kinnerton."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge is stating the government's previous legal motion regarding the evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00016884.jpg
Quote #1
"I'm letting it in because I think you persuaded me that you can argue the inference of residence from ownership."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge is explaining the ruling to allow the ownership documents as evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00016884.jpg
Quote #2
"Just -- all along, I gather that was what the defense intended to do, to establish timing of residence;"Source
— THE COURT
(The judge is stating their understanding of the defense's strategy.)
DOJ-OGR-00016884.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document