DOJ-OGR-00010332.jpg

724 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
3
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 724 KB
Summary

This document is page 9 of a legal filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 1, 2022. It outlines the court's decision to hold an evidentiary hearing on March 8, 2022, to investigate whether 'Juror 50' provided false statements during jury selection. This action followed a motion for a new trial by the Defendant, which was based on statements made by the juror.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Juror 50 Juror
Subject of an evidentiary hearing regarding potentially false statements made during jury selection and on a question...
The Defendant Defendant
Filed a motion for a new trial based on Juror 50's statements.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
The Court government agency
Presiding over the case, denied a motion for a new trial, ordered and conducted an evidentiary hearing regarding Juro...
Jury Department of the Southern District of New York government agency
Received a call from Juror 50 on January 5, 2022, asking for guidance.

Timeline (4 events)

2022-01-05
Juror 50 called the Jury Department of the Southern District of New York for guidance regarding statements he made to the media.
Southern District of New York
2022-01-19
The Defendant filed a motion for a new trial based on Juror 50's statements.
2022-02-25
The Court issued an Opinion & Order denying the Defendant's motion for a new trial on the current record and ordering an evidentiary hearing.
2022-03-08
An evidentiary hearing took place where Juror 50 appeared with counsel and testified under a grant of immunity regarding potential false answers during jury selection.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of the Jury Department that received a call from Juror 50.

Relationships (3)

Juror 50 legal The Court
The Court conducted an evidentiary hearing to question Juror 50 about his conduct during jury selection.
The Defendant legal The Court
The Defendant is a party in a case before the Court and filed a motion which the Court ruled upon.
Juror 50 professional counsel
Juror 50 appeared at the evidentiary hearing with 'retained counsel'.

Key Quotes (1)

"whether Juror 50 provided false answers on the questionnaire, the explanation for those answers, and how Juror 50 would have responded to follow-up questions if accurate answers had been provided"
Source
— The Court (Describing the limited scope of the evidentiary hearing as set forth in the February 25, 2022 Opinion & Order.)
DOJ-OGR-00010332.jpg
Quote #1

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document