DOJ-OGR-00022103.jpg

699 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order / legal filing
File Size: 699 KB
Summary

This document is page 7 of a court order filed on June 9, 2020, in the case of United States v. Thomas (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT). The Court denies the defendant's (Thomas) motion to compel disclosure of the Inspector General's report regarding Epstein's death because the report did not exist at the time. Furthermore, the Court rules that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is not considered part of the 'prosecution team' for discovery purposes (Rule 16 and Brady), as there is no evidence BOP officials participated in the criminal investigation leading to Thomas' indictment.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Thomas Defendant/Movant
Likely Michael Thomas (prison guard); seeking disclosure of materials related to Epstein's death and BOP internal rep...
Epstein Deceased Subject
Referenced in context of 'reports... regarding Epstein's death'.
Inspector General Investigator
Conducting an investigation; the report did not exist at the time of the order.
Collins Legal Reference
Referenced in case citation (Collins, 409 F. Supp. 3d at 239).

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
United States District Court
The entity issuing the order (implied by case header and ruling language).
BOP
Bureau of Prisons; subject of discovery request regarding whether they are part of the prosecution team.
Department of Justice
Parent organization of the BOP.
MCC
Metropolitan Correctional Center; mentioned regarding employee disciplinary records.
Government
The Prosecution.

Timeline (2 events)

Prior to 2020-06-09
Epstein's death
MCC (implied)
Prior to 2020-06-09
Thomas' indictment
Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
MCC
Metropolitan Correctional Center (implied New York context based on case history).

Relationships (3)

Thomas Adversarial (Legal) Government
Thomas filed a motion to compel against the Government; Government opposed.
BOP Organizational Department of Justice
Text states: 'the BOP is a component of the Department of Justice'
BOP Separate Entities Prosecution Team
Court concludes BOP was not part of the prosecution team for Rule 16/Brady purposes.

Key Quotes (5)

"The Court cannot grant a motion to compel the Government to produce a report that, at the time of this order, does not exist."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00022103.jpg
Quote #1
"Accordingly, Thomas’ motion to compel disclosure of materials related to the Inspector General’s investigation is DENIED."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00022103.jpg
Quote #2
"Thomas has adduced no evidence that the Government reviewed information arising from a BOP investigation."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00022103.jpg
Quote #3
"Thus, the Court concludes that the BOP was not part of the prosecution team for purposes of Rule 16 and Brady."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00022103.jpg
Quote #4
"To be sure, the BOP is a component of the Department of Justice, but that fact standing alone is not sufficient to make the BOP an arm of the prosecution."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00022103.jpg
Quote #5

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document