DOJ-OGR-00018614.jpg

523 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 523 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge and counsel for the government (Mr. Rohrbach) and an opposing party (Ms. Menninger). Mr. Rohrbach confirms that the government will not question a witness, Mr. Flatley, about 'CDs' during direct examination, which resolves a procedural issue and satisfies the court and Ms. Menninger. The judge remarks that prior preparation for this line of questioning is now moot but may be saved for future use.

People (5)

Name Role Context
MR. ROHRBACH Counsel
A speaker in the court transcript, representing the government's position.
Ms. Pomerantz Counsel
Mentioned by Mr. Rohrbach as someone he needs to confer with, likely part of the government's legal team.
Mr. Flatley Witness
The subject of the discussion, a person who is to be questioned in court.
THE COURT Judge
A speaker in the transcript, presiding over the proceedings and addressed as 'your Honor'.
Ms. Menninger Counsel
A speaker in the court transcript, likely representing the opposing party, who agrees with the proposed course of act...

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Appears at the bottom of the document as the court reporting service.
government government agency
Mentioned multiple times as a party in the legal proceeding, represented by Mr. Rohrbach.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A discussion between the judge and counsel regarding the scope of questioning for a witness, Mr. Flatley. The government confirms it will not ask Mr. Flatley about 'CDs' on direct examination, resolving a potential issue for cross-examination.
Courtroom
THE COURT MR. ROHRBACH MS. MENNINGER

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.'

Relationships (3)

MR. ROHRBACH professional Ms. Pomerantz
Mr. Rohrbach states, 'If I could confer with Ms. Pomerantz,' indicating they are colleagues on the same legal team (the government).
MR. ROHRBACH professional MS. MENNINGER
They are opposing counsel in a court proceeding, discussing the scope of witness testimony before the judge.
MR. ROHRBACH professional THE COURT
Mr. Rohrbach is counsel addressing the judge ('your Honor') in a formal court setting.

Key Quotes (3)

"Your Honor, the government is not planning to talk with Mr. Flatley on direct about CDs."
Source
— MR. ROHRBACH (Stating the government's position on the scope of their direct examination of the witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00018614.jpg
Quote #1
"So if you're not going to ask about CDs on direct, if he's not crossed on CDs, that's the end of the matter."
Source
— THE COURT (Summarizing the agreement and concluding the issue.)
DOJ-OGR-00018614.jpg
Quote #2
"Well, it sounds like all that work we did on Flatley last night will just go in the can for future use."
Source
— THE COURT (A concluding remark suggesting that preparation was done for a line of questioning that will now not be necessary.)
DOJ-OGR-00018614.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document