DOJ-OGR-00019593.jpg
633 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
633 KB
Summary
This document is a legal filing, specifically an appeal, related to Case 20-3061. The appellant, Ms. Maxwell, challenges a district court order by Judge Nathan that denied her request to share information with another judge. The filing argues that the appellate court has jurisdiction to review this order under the collateral order doctrine, countering the government's contention that the order is unreviewable.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Appellant / Party in a legal case |
The person whose motion to modify a protective order was denied, and who is now appealing that decision.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
The judge who issued the order being appealed, which denied Ms. Maxwell's request to share information.
|
| Judge Preska | Judge |
Another judge mentioned in the context of a future order unsealing deposition material.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| district court | government agency |
The court that issued the order being challenged in the appeal.
|
| The government | government agency |
A party in the legal case, contending that the Court lacks jurisdiction to review Judge Nathan's order.
|
| this Court | government agency |
Refers to the appellate court hearing the appeal of Judge Nathan's order.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2020-09-28
An appeal was filed challenging the district court's order denying Ms. Maxwell's motion.
appellate court
Ms. Maxwell filed a motion to modify a protective order to share information with another judge.
district court
The district court, via Judge Nathan, denied Ms. Maxwell's motion to modify the protective order.
district court
Relationships (3)
The document describes a legal dispute where Ms. Maxwell is appealing an order, and 'The government contends' an opposing view on jurisdiction.
Described as 'co-equal judge', indicating they are colleagues within the judiciary.
Judge Nathan ruled on Ms. Maxwell's motion, and Ms. Maxwell is appealing that ruling.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document