DOJ-OGR-00021132.jpg
605 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
0
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
605 KB
Summary
This legal document argues that the court incorrectly applied Federal Rule of Evidence 606 to block an inquiry into statements made by Juror 50 to journalists. The author contends that because the juror voluntarily broadcast his experiences and role in the deliberations to convict Maxwell, the rule's purpose of protecting jurors from harassment is not applicable in this specific instance. The document cites 'Tanner v. United States' as precedent for the rationale behind the rule.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
Mentioned as the subject of an inquiry regarding his statements to journalists and his use of prior abuse experience ...
|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned as the person the jury was persuaded to convict, in part due to Juror 50's actions.
|
| Tanner | Party in a legal case |
Mentioned in the legal citation 'Tanner v. United States' as precedent regarding juror testimony.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | government agency |
Mentioned as a party in the legal citation 'Tanner v. United States'.
|
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document