DOJ-OGR-00009010.jpg

619 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 619 KB
Summary

This legal document, part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, argues for a new trial for Ms. Maxwell. The basis for the argument is that Juror No. 50 provided a false answer on a jury questionnaire regarding their personal experience with sexual assault, which was a core issue in the case. This alleged dishonesty is claimed to have undermined the jury selection process (voir dire) and deprived Ms. Maxwell of her constitutional right to a fair trial by an impartial jury.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Juror No. 50 Juror
Alleged to have not truthfully responded to a question on the jury questionnaire regarding personal experiences with ...
Ms. Maxwell Defendant
The subject of the core allegations in the case. The document argues she was deprived of her constitutional right to ...

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
The Court government agency
Presided over the case, summoned potential jurors, provided the jury questionnaire, and assured parties of follow-up ...

Timeline (2 events)

The Court summoned about seven hundred potential jurors who were gathered in groups of 100 or more over three days to complete a 22-page questionnaire under penalty of perjury.
courthouse
The Court potential jurors
Juror No. 50 did not truthfully respond to a question on the jury questionnaire about whether they had been a victim of sexual assault or abuse.
courthouse

Locations (1)

Location Context
Where groups of potential jurors were gathered to complete questionnaires.

Relationships (1)

Juror No. 50 legal (juror-defendant) Ms. Maxwell
The document alleges that Juror No. 50's false answer on a questionnaire deprived Ms. Maxwell of a fair and impartial jury.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document