DOJ-OGR-00009378.jpg
447 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
447 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated February 24, 2022, detailing the recross-examination of a witness named Brune. The Court questions Brune about their firm's ethical obligation to disclose information from a July 21 letter concerning an investigation into Juror No. 1. Brune states that while they have an ethical duty to be accurate and honest, they do not believe they were obligated to proactively disclose the information or anticipate the government's arguments if the court had not inquired.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
The person being questioned during a recross-examination.
|
| MR. SCHECTMAN | Attorney |
An attorney questioning the witness, Brune.
|
| Ms. Davis | Attorney |
An attorney addressed by the Court.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
The presiding judicial officer asking questions of the witness and attorneys.
|
| THE WITNESS | Witness |
A speaker role in the transcript, referring to Brune.
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
The subject of an investigation mentioned in a July 21 letter.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-02-24
Recross-examination of witness Brune by Mr. Schectman and the Court.
Courtroom
An investigation into Juror No. 1, referenced in a July 21 letter.
Juror No. 1
Brune's firm
Relationships (3)
The Court directly questions Brune, who is testifying as a witness.
Mr. Schectman conducts a recross-examination of the witness, Brune.
Key Quotes (2)
"I don't think we would have, your Honor. And as I think about it, we have an ethical obligation to be accurate and honest, and it's something that we take very seriously."Source
— THE WITNESS
(Responding to the Court's question about whether their firm would have disclosed information about Juror No. 1 if the Court had not inquired.)
DOJ-OGR-00009378.jpg
Quote #1
"But I don't think that we're obliged to identify arguments that the government might make in our opening brief."Source
— THE WITNESS
(Explaining the limits of their ethical obligations regarding disclosure.)
DOJ-OGR-00009378.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document