DOJ-OGR-00009386.jpg

447 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

6
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 447 KB
Summary

This document is a transcript of a legal proceeding where a witness, Edelstein, is being questioned about their knowledge of another person's (Ms. Trzaskoma) suspicion. The core issue is whether Ms. Trzaskoma believed there was a connection between Juror No. 1 and a suspended New York attorney with the same name, and whether the witness ever asked for the evidence underlying this suspicion. The witness states they did not ask for underlying documents or information.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Edelstein Witness
Appears to be the person being questioned (answering as 'A').
Ms. Trzaskoma
A person whose beliefs about a juror and an attorney are the subject of the questioning.
Juror No. 1 Juror
Mentioned as the source of a note and as potentially being connected to a suspended attorney.
MR. GAVI Attorney
Makes an objection during the questioning.
THE COURT Judge
Rules on an objection, overruling it.
Theresa Trzaskoma
Full name for Ms. Trzaskoma, mentioned in a question.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-02-24
Questioning of a witness, Edelstein, regarding what they knew about Ms. Trzaskoma's suspicion of a connection between Juror No. 1 and a suspended New York attorney.
Courtroom
Edelstein MR. GAVI THE COURT Unnamed Questioner

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in reference to a "suspended New York attorney".

Relationships (2)

Juror No. 1 potential identity suspended New York attorney
The document discusses Ms. Trzaskoma's suspicion that Juror No. 1 and a suspended New York attorney with the same name might be the same person, based on a note from the juror mentioning legal concepts.
Edelstein professional Ms. Trzaskoma
Edelstein is being questioned about conversations with Ms. Trzaskoma and what steps, if any, were taken to verify her suspicions.

Key Quotes (3)

"I don't believe she had formed a belief about the New York attorney. She mentioned that there was an attorney, a suspended attorney with the same name, and that after having received the note from Juror No. 1 that mentioned several legal concepts, she had thought that could it possibly be they were the same person."
Source
— A (Edelstein) (Responding to a question about the attorney, explaining Ms. Trzaskoma's thought process.)
DOJ-OGR-00009386.jpg
Quote #1
"So do you mean to tell us that you at no point asked Theresa Trzaskoma for what underlying information she saw that led her to believe that there was a possible connection between Juror No. 1 and the suspended New York attorney? Yes or no."
Source
— Q (Unnamed Questioner) (Pressing the witness on whether they investigated the basis for Ms. Trzaskoma's belief.)
DOJ-OGR-00009386.jpg
Quote #2
"No, I did not."
Source
— A (Edelstein) (Answering whether they asked Ms. Trzaskoma how she formed her belief or what she looked at.)
DOJ-OGR-00009386.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document