DOJ-OGR-00019638.jpg
681 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
681 KB
Summary
This legal document, part of an appeal, critiques Ghislaine Maxwell's arguments for keeping criminal discovery materials sealed in her civil cases. The author contends that Maxwell has failed to provide a coherent legal basis for her request and did not adequately explain the relevance of the materials to Judge Nathan. Maxwell's concern is that unsealing the deposition material could prevent her from making future arguments to Judge Nathan regarding alleged government misconduct.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Litigant |
Subject of the legal arguments, seeking to keep discovery materials sealed in her civil cases.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Presided over a matter where it was concluded that Maxwell did not provide sufficient explanation for keeping documen...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | government agency |
An opposing party in litigation with Maxwell, who obtained materials she seeks to keep sealed.
|
| Second Circuit | government agency |
Mentioned in the context of a body of law Maxwell alleges the Government circumvented.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Maxwell's appeal regarding the unsealing of discovery materials from a criminal case for use in civil cases.
Second Circuit
Relationships (2)
The document describes them as opposing parties in suppression litigation and other legal matters.
Maxwell is a litigant making arguments before Judge Nathan, who is the presiding judge in one of her cases.
Key Quotes (3)
"furnishe[d] no substantive explanation regarding the relevance of the Documents to decisions to be made in those matters, let alone any explanation of why modifying the protective order in order to allow such disclosure is necessary to ensure the fair adjudication of those matters."Source
— Judge Nathan
(Quoted as Judge Nathan's conclusion regarding Maxwell's failure to justify keeping documents sealed.)
DOJ-OGR-00019638.jpg
Quote #1
"if the deposition material is unsealed, it may foreclose"Source
— Maxwell
(Part of Maxwell's argument that unsealing material would prevent her from making certain arguments to Judge Nathan.)
DOJ-OGR-00019638.jpg
Quote #2
"all [she] seeks in this appeal is the ability to"Source
— Maxwell
(A claim made by Maxwell regarding the purpose of her appeal.)
DOJ-OGR-00019638.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document