DOJ-OGR-00014719.jpg
643 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
643 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument about jury instructions. An attorney argues that the existing instructions are sufficient and that sending new, confusing ones would be a mistake. The judge ('THE COURT') then critiques the defense's newly proposed instruction, stating it addresses a count the jury didn't ask about and contains a legally incorrect paragraph concerning sexual activity involving a person named 'Jane' in states other than New York.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Judge | Honor / THE COURT |
Referred to as 'your Honor' by a speaker and speaks as 'THE COURT'. The judge is discussing jury instructions.
|
| Jane |
Mentioned in the context of a proposed jury instruction regarding her sexual activity in New York and New Mexico.
|
|
| Mr. Everdell |
Addressed directly by the Court regarding a previous discussion about sexual activity involving Jane.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion took place in court regarding the appropriateness of sending new legal instructions to the jury. The defense's proposed instruction for Count Two was analyzed and criticized by the judge.
Courtroom (implied)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in a proposed jury instruction regarding where sexual activity with Jane could form the basis of legal elem...
|
|
|
Mentioned in the context of sexual activity with Jane under the age of 17.
|
Relationships (2)
The Judge directly addresses Mr. Everdell in a formal court setting, referencing a prior discussion they had.
The unnamed speaker, likely an attorney, addresses the judge as 'your Honor' while presenting a legal argument.
Key Quotes (3)
"The simple course is exactly the course the Court took yesterday, which is to refer the jury to a thorough and complete and accurate legal instruction."Source
— Unnamed Speaker
(Arguing that the existing jury instructions are sufficient and no new ones are needed.)
DOJ-OGR-00014719.jpg
Quote #1
"I mean, the defense's new proposed instruction talks about Count Two, which wasn't asked about."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge begins to critique the defense's proposed new jury instruction.)
DOJ-OGR-00014719.jpg
Quote #2
"And then the third paragraph I think is just wrong, an intent that Jane engaged in sexual activity in any state other than New York cannot form the basis of these elements."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge identifies a specific legal error in the defense's proposed jury instruction.)
DOJ-OGR-00014719.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document