DOJ-OGR-00009391.jpg
397 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal transcript
File Size:
397 KB
Summary
This document is a legal transcript from a deposition where the witness, Edelstein, is questioned about the discovery of information regarding Juror No. 1, Catherine M. Conrad. The questioning focuses on the timeline of when Edelstein's side learned from a Westlaw report that the juror was a suspended attorney, referencing an email sent within the firm, a letter received on June 20, and a court conference on July 15 involving Theresa Trzaskoma.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edelstein | Witness |
The person being questioned throughout the transcript.
|
| Catherine M. Conrad | Juror No. 1 / suspended attorney |
The subject of a Westlaw report, identified as Juror No. 1 and a suspended attorney.
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
Identified as Catherine M. Conrad, the subject of an inquiry.
|
| Theresa Trzaskoma |
Mentioned as a participant in a court conference on July 15.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Westlaw | company |
Mentioned as the source of a report about Catherine M. Conrad.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Someone looked at a Westlaw report concerning Catherine M. Conrad.
her (unidentified person)
Relationships (2)
The questioner asks if the witness noticed the "same name for her father" in a personal injury report.
The questioning implies they are colleagues or on the same legal team, as Edelstein reviewed a report before Trzaskoma participated in a court conference.
Key Quotes (1)
"Jesus, I think this is the one,"Source
— somebody else in your firm
(Quoted from an email sent after reviewing a Westlaw report, indicating a belief that Juror No. 1 was Catherine M. Conrad, the suspended attorney.)
DOJ-OGR-00009391.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document