DOJ-OGR-00013996.jpg

523 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

7
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 523 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion during a trial break. The judge instructs the attorneys (Pomerantz, Sternheim, Rohrbach, Everdell) to confer and narrow their disagreements regarding a witness's prior inconsistent statements. The judge states an intention to review these statements during the lunch break to help resolve the issues later that day.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Loftus Subject of direct examination
Mentioned in the header of the transcript: 'Loftus - direct'.
THE COURT Judge
Speaker in the transcript, directing the proceedings.
MS. POMERANTZ Attorney
Speaker in the transcript, representing the government.
MS. STERNHEIM Attorney
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the Judge.
THE WITNESS Witness
An unnamed individual who is excused from the courtroom.
MR. ROHRBACH Attorney
Speaker in the transcript, responding on behalf of the government.
MR. EVERDELL Attorney
Speaker in the transcript, agreeing to confer on issues.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting service.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
A discussion between the judge and attorneys during a break in a trial, with the jury not present.
Courtroom
2022-08-10
Attorneys were instructed to confer to narrow issues of disagreement.

Relationships (4)

THE COURT professional MS. POMERANTZ
The Court directs the proceedings and Ms. Pomerantz, representing the government, responds to the Court's questions.
THE COURT professional MS. STERNHEIM
Ms. Sternheim addresses the Court as 'Judge' in a formal court setting.
THE COURT professional MR. ROHRBACH
Mr. Rohrbach responds to the Court's question on behalf of the government, addressing the Court as 'your Honor'.
THE COURT professional MR. EVERDELL
Mr. Everdell responds to the Court's directive regarding conferring on legal issues.

Key Quotes (2)

"On the prior inconsistent statements, I'm going to spend my lunch looking through them, but I'm hoping there will be consultation and stipulation in narrowing so that we can really get down to where there is genuine disagreement after you've had some discussion."
Source
— THE COURT (The judge outlining the plan for the break to resolve issues with witness statements.)
DOJ-OGR-00013996.jpg
Quote #1
"We will try to confer, see if we can narrow the issues."
Source
— MR. EVERDELL (Responding to the judge's request for the parties to work on resolving disagreements.)
DOJ-OGR-00013996.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document