DOJ-OGR-00001686.jpg
1.12 MB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1.12 MB
Summary
This legal document, dated July 29, 2020, is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The defense argues against the government's proposed restrictive protective order, asserting their right to publicly reference alleged victims who have already identified themselves in media, other lawsuits, and public forums related to both Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. They contrast their broader proposed language with the government's version, which they claim would unfairly limit them to referencing only one person who spoke at Maxwell's bail hearing.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Addressed as 'The Honorable Alison J. Nathan' at the top of the letter, indicating she is the presiding judge in the ...
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of litigation |
Mentioned in relation to his own criminal case (United States v. Jeffrey Epstein) and as a subject about whom alleged...
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Referred to as 'Ms. Maxwell', she is the defendant in the current case (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The docu...
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Netflix | company |
Mentioned as a platform where alleged victims have appeared in documentaries.
|
| YouTube | company |
Mentioned as a platform where alleged victims have appeared in videos.
|
| company |
Mentioned as a search engine that can be used to find public information about alleged victims.
|
|
| Cox Broad. Corp. | company |
Mentioned in a legal citation, 'Cox Broad. Corp. v. Cohn', to support a legal argument about privacy.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2019-08-27
A hearing in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein where 11 alleged victims spoke or submitted letters under their own names.
Jeffrey Epstein
11 alleged victims
Ms. Maxwell's bail hearing, where one individual spoke under her own name.
Ghislaine Maxwell
one individual
Relationships (2)
The document discusses litigation and public commentary 'relating to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell', linking them as subjects of the same public and legal scrutiny.
The document describes individuals as 'alleged victims' who have made 'allegations against Ms. Maxwell' and have 'civilly sued Ms. Maxwell'.
Key Quotes (3)
"Nor does this Order prohibit Defense Counsel from publicly referencing individuals who have spoken on the public record to the media or in public fora, or in litigation – criminal or otherwise – relating to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell."Source
— Defense Counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell
(This is the language proposed by the defense for the protective order, which they argue should be included.)
DOJ-OGR-00001686.jpg
Quote #1
"This Order does not prohibit Defense Counsel from publicly referencing individuals who have spoken by name on the public record in this case"Source
— The government
(This is the more limited language for the protective order proposed by the government, which the defense is arguing against.)
DOJ-OGR-00001686.jpg
Quote #2
"the interests in privacy fade when the information involved already appears on the public record."Source
— Cox Broad. Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U.S. 469, 494-95 (1975)
(A legal precedent cited by the defense to argue that alleged victims who have publicly identified themselves have a diminished privacy interest.)
DOJ-OGR-00001686.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document