DOJ-OGR-00005613.jpg
667 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal motion (motion in limine)
File Size:
667 KB
Summary
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Motion in Limine) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on October 29, 2021. The defense argues that the Government should be precluded from introducing certain evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) because the prosecution failed to provide particularized notice and reasoning as required by the December 2020 amendments to the rule. The text outlines the specific requirements of the amended rule regarding notice in criminal cases.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Moving to exclude evidence the Government seeks to admit.
|
| The Government | Prosecution |
Opposing party; accused of failing to follow Rule 404(b) requirements regarding evidence notice.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
|
| Advisory Committee |
Mentioned in relation to the 2020 Amendments notes.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2021-10-11
Relationships (1)
Maxwell is moving to exclude evidence offered by the Government.
Key Quotes (3)
"Ghislaine Maxwell moves in limine to exclude any evidence the Government seeks to admit at trial under Fed. R. Evid. 404(b)"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005613.jpg
Quote #1
"the Government opted not to follow the requirements of the Rule and should now be foreclosed from offering any evidence pursuant to Rule 404(b)."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005613.jpg
Quote #2
"Prior to the rule change, the prosecution needed only to give notice of the “general nature” of the anticipated evidence"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005613.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document