DOJ-OGR-00008508.jpg
582 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
582 KB
Summary
This document is page 52 of a legal filing from December 17, 2021, in the case against Ms. Maxwell. It contains jury instructions regarding the legal definition and requirements for proving an "overt act" as part of a conspiracy. The instructions clarify that the government does not need to prove Maxwell herself committed the act, that the act does not have to be one specifically listed in the indictment, and that a conviction on certain counts cannot be based solely on the testimony of a witness named Kate.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein | Employer |
Mentioned as the employer of Carolyn.
|
| Carolyn | Employee of Epstein |
An employee of Epstein who was called to schedule appointments.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
The defendant in the case, mentioned in the context of whether she needed to have personally committed an overt act.
|
| Kate | Witness |
A witness whose testimony alone is insufficient to convict the Defendant on Counts One or Three for an overt act invo...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | government agency |
The prosecuting party in the legal case, responsible for proving the elements of the crime.
|
Relationships (3)
The document outlines the Government's burden of proof against Ms. Maxwell, the Defendant.
Kate is described as a witness whose testimony is being used by the Government in its case.
Key Quotes (1)
"Put simply: you may not convict the Defendant on Counts One or Three solely on the basis of Kate's testimony or an overt act involving Kate."Source
— Court (Jury Instructions)
(Instructing the jury on the limitations of using witness Kate's testimony for conviction on specific counts.)
DOJ-OGR-00008508.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document