DOJ-OGR-00001171.jpg

720 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 720 KB
Summary

This legal document argues for the continued detention of a defendant, asserting she is a significant flight risk due to her financial means, foreign ties, and willingness to hide. The author dismisses proposed bail conditions like a $1 million bond from a security company and GPS monitoring as insufficient, citing several legal precedents (U.S. v. Banki, Zarger, and Benatar) where similar measures were deemed inadequate for high-risk defendants.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Banki Defendant
Mentioned as the defendant in the cited case United States v. Banki, who was denied bail.
Zarger Defendant
Mentioned as the defendant in the cited case United States v. Zarger, whose application for bail was rejected.
Benatar Defendant
Mentioned as the defendant in the cited case United States v. Benatar.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
United States government agency
Party in the cited legal cases: United States v. Banki, United States v. Zarger, and United States v. Benatar.
S.D.N.Y. court
Abbreviation for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, mentioned in the citation fo...
E.D.N.Y. court
Abbreviation for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, mentioned in the citations fo...
2d Cir. court
Abbreviation for the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which affirmed the Banki decision.

Timeline (3 events)

2000-08-04
Rejection of a defendant's application for bail in the case of United States v. Zarger.
E.D.N.Y.
2002-10-10
Legal ruling in the case of United States v. Benatar.
E.D.N.Y.
2010-01-21
Denial of bail in the case of United States v. Banki.
S.D.N.Y.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as the native country of the defendant in the Banki case.

Relationships (1)

United States legal adversary defendant
The document presents arguments from the perspective of the prosecution (United States) against the defendant's release on bail.

Key Quotes (3)

"privately funded jail"
Source
— Unknown (quoted by the author) (Used to describe the proposed release conditions for the defendant, which the author argues are not warranted.)
DOJ-OGR-00001171.jpg
Quote #1
"hardly foolproof"
Source
— Court in United States v. Banki (A quote from a previous court case describing the unreliability of electronic monitoring.)
DOJ-OGR-00001171.jpg
Quote #2
"at best . . . limits a fleeing defendant’s head start"
Source
— Court in United States v. Zarger (A quote from a previous court case describing the limited effectiveness of home detention with electronic monitoring.)
DOJ-OGR-00001171.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document