DOJ-OGR-00019621.jpg

566 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 566 KB
Summary

This document is a legal filing arguing that the court lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal by Maxwell. The argument is based on the 'final judgment rule' (28 U.S.C. § 1291), asserting that the order being appealed is not a final decision and does not qualify as an immediately appealable collateral order. The document notes that the Government filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on similar grounds on September 16, 2020.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Giuffre Party in a lawsuit
Mentioned in the case name 'Giuffre v. Maxwell'.
Maxwell Party in a lawsuit / Appellant
Mentioned in the case name 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' and as the individual whose appeal is being discussed.
Van Cauwenberghe Party in a cited case
Mentioned in the case citation 'Van Cauwenberghe v. Biard, 486 U.S. 517, 522 (1988)'.
Biard Party in a cited case
Mentioned in the case citation 'Van Cauwenberghe v. Biard, 486 U.S. 517, 522 (1988)'.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Government government agency
Mentioned as having filed a motion to dismiss Maxwell's appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Courts of Appeals Judicial body
Mentioned in the context of its jurisdiction being limited by Title 28, United States Code, Section 1291.

Timeline (2 events)

2020-09-16
The Government filed a motion to dismiss Maxwell’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction and requested that the Court deny Maxwell’s motion for consolidation.
2d Cir.
An appeal is currently pending in the case of Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413.
2d Cir.

Relationships (2)

Giuffre Adversarial (legal) Maxwell
They are opposing parties in the lawsuit 'Giuffre v. Maxwell'.
Government Adversarial (legal) Maxwell
The Government filed a motion to dismiss Maxwell's appeal.

Key Quotes (3)

"Motion to Dismiss"
Source
— The document (referring to the Government's motion) (Used as a shorthand name for the Government's motion to dismiss Maxwell's appeal and deny consolidation.)
DOJ-OGR-00019621.jpg
Quote #1
"small class"
Source
— The document (paraphrasing legal standard) (Describing the type of decisions that constitute immediately appealable collateral orders, which Maxwell's Order allegedly does not fall into.)
DOJ-OGR-00019621.jpg
Quote #2
"final decisions of the district courts."
Source
— Title 28, United States Code, Section 1291 (Quoted from the statute to define the jurisdictional limits of the Courts of Appeals.)
DOJ-OGR-00019621.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document